OpenAI has launched a major upgrade to its ChatGPT Plus subscription users with the latest large language model (LLM) upgrade - the 'Creative Writing' feature of ChatGPT-4o. According to a brief statement from OpenAI on X (formerly Twitter), the upgraded model's writing capabilities are more natural and engaging, and can be tailored to user needs, enhancing the relevance and readability of the content. With this upgrade, ChatGPT-4o is considered to have reached new heights in the field of creative writing.

OpenAI researchers recently discovered an interesting phenomenon: the usernames chosen by users when interacting with ChatGPT may subtly influence the AI's responses. However, this influence is generally very small and primarily limited to earlier, unoptimized versions of the model. This study delves into the differences in ChatGPT's reactions to identical questions when faced with usernames related to different cultural backgrounds, genders, and ethnicities. The choice of usernames as a focal point for the research was made because names often carry specific cultural, gender, and ethnic connotations.

Recently, OpenAI's research team discovered that the usernames chosen by users can somewhat influence the responses of ChatGPT during interactions. Although this effect is relatively minor and primarily seen in older models, the findings are still noteworthy. Users typically provide their names to ChatGPT for tasks, making the cultural, gender, and racial backgrounds inherent in those names an important factor in studying bias. In this research, the researchers explored ChatGPT.

In recent years, with the rise of generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, discussions about their impact on creativity and new ideas have grown increasingly fervent. Recently, researchers from the University College London School of Management and the University of Exeter conducted a new study specifically exploring the effects of generative models on creative writing. The researchers experimented with human-authored short stories, analyzing the impact on writers' creative output after exposure to